- Fix bug in lcd_control_temperature_menu
- Remove test menu-item left in from multi-line command feature
- Replace literals with translatable strings
- Reduce lcd_preheat code redundancy
- Reduce menu macro redundancy
- Clean up formatting
Introduced lcd_strlen() and lcd_strlen_P().
Replaced the old functions where necessary.
Reworked language_ru.h.
Speeded up test for zero length string in cardreader.cpp
* Adds config parameter `PID_PARAMS_PER_EXTRUDER` - allows single PID
parameters to be used where this would be preferable (e.g. dual
identical extruders)
* When disabled, will use `float Kp, Ki, Kd, Kc;` as before.
Preprocessor macros used to switch between.
* ultralcd.cpp defines extra menus for extra parameters only where
required
* M301 reports `e:xx` only if independent pid parameters enabled
* EEPROM structure still leaves space for 3 extruders worth, when undef
will save single parameter to all extruder positions, but only read the
first
* Switching off saves approx 330 B with no LCD enabled, 2634B with LCD
(RRD) enabled: this is significant.
* LCD modifications should be tested.
* Depending on extruder count, will add menu items for ultralcd to edit
individual PID parameters for each extruder
* Added menu items to each language_xx.h
* Builds OK, but recommend testing with typical LCD
Small changes (and formatting to confuse the diff’er) which first
allows DOGLCD and LCD_PROGRESS_BAR to be enabled in tandem, then a
#warning (rather than error) that the extra progress bar / message
options don’t apply to graphical displays at this time. This leaves
open perhaps combining the progress bar and message area in some future
(or forked custom) graphical LCD display arrangement (at which time the
relevant variables may be moved into ultralcd.cpp with externs in
ultralcd.h). I also added a conditional error that the progress bar and
the filament display may not work well together.
This is the optimal code for a self-contained formatter, although the
original code is crafty in being smaller and simpler, and can be
evaluated as using the original output as a scratch pad for state,
making the final formatter more straightforward. While this code is
longer, all code-paths are minimal.
This is the optimal code for a self-contained formatter, although the
original code is crafty in being smaller and simpler, and can be
evaluated as using the original output as a scratch pad for state,
making the final formatter more straightforward. While this code is
longer, all code-paths are minimal.
